Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the registrant  ☒                             Filed by a party other than the registrant  ☐
Check the appropriate box:
 
☐ | | Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐ | | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☒ | | Definitive Proxy Statement
☐ | | Definitive Additional Materials
☐ | | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | | No fee required
☐ | | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
| | (1) | | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| | (2) | | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| | (3) | | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| | (4) | | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| | (5) | | Total fee paid:
☐ | | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐ | | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by Registration Statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| | (1) | | Amount previously paid:
| | (2) | | Form, Schedule, or Registration Statement No.:
| | (3) | | Filing party:
| | (4) | | Date filed:

 

Table of Contents
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
245 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10167
March 22, 2017
Dear stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., which will be held on Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of Angelo, Gordon & Co., L.P. (“Angelo, Gordon”), located on the 25 ^th  Floor of 245 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10167. Details of the business to be presented at the meeting can be found in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement.
Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials (“Notice”) on or about March 22, 2017 to our stockholders of record on March 8, 2017. The Notice and Proxy Statement contain instructions for your use of this process, including how to access our proxy statement and annual report over the Internet, how to authorize your proxy to vote online and how to request a paper copy of the proxy statement and annual report if you so desire.
If you are unable to attend the meeting in person, it is very important that your shares be represented and voted at the annual meeting. You may authorize your proxy to vote your shares over the Internet as described in the Notice and Proxy Statement. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, please complete, date, sign and promptly return the proxy card by mail so that your shares may be voted. You may also vote by telephone as described in your proxy card. If you vote your shares over the Internet, by mail or by telephone prior to the annual meeting, you may nevertheless revoke your proxy and cast your vote personally at the meeting.
On behalf of the board of directors, I extend our appreciation for your participation and continued support.
Sincerely,
David N. Roberts
Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 3, 2017
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the offices of Angelo, Gordon & Co., L.P., located at 245 Park Avenue, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10167, on Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, for the purposes set forth below:
 
| 1. | election of the board of directors, with each director serving a one-year term and until his successor is elected and qualified;
 
| 2. | ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017;
 
| 3. | approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation; and
 
| 4. | approval of an amendment to our charter removing the provision giving the board of directors the exclusive power to adopt, alter or repeal any Bylaws of the Company;
We will transact no other business at the Annual Meeting, except for business properly brought before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Only holders of record of our common stock on March 8, 2017 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of and to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
If you plan on attending the Annual Meeting in person, you will need to present your admission ticket, or an account statement showing your ownership of our common stock as of the Record Date, and photo identification. Your proxy card will serve as your admission ticket. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please authorize your proxy to vote your shares over the Internet, as described in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, please mark, sign, date and promptly return the proxy card in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided. You may also authorize your proxy to vote your shares by telephone as described in your proxy card. Stockholders who vote over the Internet, by mail or by telephone prior to the Annual Meeting may nevertheless attend the Annual Meeting, revoke their proxies and vote their shares in person.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Raul E. Moreno
General Counsel and Secretary
March 22, 2017
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on Wednesday, May 3, 2017.  This proxy statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 are available on the “Financial Reports” page of the “Investor Relations” section of our web site at  www.agmit.com .

Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
| | Page |
PROXY STATEMENT | | | 1 |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS | | | 1 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | | | 4 |
DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | | | 5 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | | | 8 |
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | | | 13 |
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS | | | 14 |
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT | | | 15 |
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | | | 17 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | | | 18 |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT | | | 22 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION | | | 23 |
COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP OF OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND SIGNIFICANT STOCKHOLDERS | | | 25 |
PROPOSAL 4: PROPOSAL TO AMEND OUR CHARTER | | | 27 |
OTHER MATTERS | | | 28 |

Table of Contents
2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF
AG MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) for use at our 2017 annual meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of Angelo, Gordon & Co., L.P., located at 245 Park Avenue, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10167, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. We are sending this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy to our stockholders commencing on or about March 22, 2017.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
 
Q: | What am I voting on?
 
A: | (1)   Election of seven directors for terms of one year;
 
| (2) | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017;
 
| (3) | Approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation; and
 
| (4) | Approval of the Company’s Articles of Amendment to Articles of Amendment and Restatement (the “Charter Amendment”) removing the board of directors sole power to adopt, alter or repeal any Bylaws of the Company.
 
Q: | How does the board of directors recommend that I vote on these proposals?
 
A: | (1)   “FOR” the election of each of the nominees as directors;
 
| (2) | “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017;
 
| (3) | “FOR” the approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation; and
 
| (4) | “FOR” the approval of the Charter Amendment.
 
Q: | Who is entitled to vote?
 
A: | Only common stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 8, 2017 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
 
Q: | What is the quorum for the meeting?
 
A: | A quorum will be present at the Annual Meeting if a majority of the votes entitled to be cast are present, in person or by proxy. No business may be conducted at the Annual Meeting if a quorum is not present. As of the Record Date, 27,701,902 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. If less than a majority of outstanding shares entitled to vote are represented at the Annual Meeting, we expect that the Annual Meeting will be adjourned to solicit additional proxies. Notice need not be given of the new date, time or place if announced at the Annual Meeting before an adjournment is taken.
 
Q: | How many votes do I have?
 
A: | You are entitled to one vote for each whole share of common stock you hold as of the Record Date. Our stockholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes for directors.
 
Q: | What are the voting requirements that apply to the proposals discussed in this proxy statement?
 
A: | | | | Proposal | | Vote Required | | | Discretionary Voting Allowed? |
| | (1) | | Election of directors | | | Plurality | ** | | | No |
| | (2) | | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | | | Majority | * | | | Yes |
| | (3) | | Advisory vote on our executive compensation | | | Majority | * | | | No |
| | (4) | | Approval of the Charter Amendment | | | Majority | * | | | No |
 
1

Table of Contents
* “Majority” means, with regard to the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the advisory vote on our executive compensation, a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, and with respect to the Charter Amendment means a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.
** “Plurality” means, with regard to the election of directors, the seven nominees for director receiving the greatest number of “for” votes from our shares cast at the Annual Meeting.
 
Q:    What | is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
 
A: | If your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are the “stockholder of record” of those shares.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares. The Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) and proxy statement and any accompanying documents have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.
 
Q: | How do I vote?
 
A: | Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to authorize your proxy to vote your shares over the Internet as described in the Notice. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, please complete, date, sign and promptly return the proxy card in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided. Authorizing your proxy over the Internet, by mailing a proxy card or by telephone will not limit your right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.
 
Q: | How do I vote my shares that are held by my broker?
 
A: | If you have shares held by a broker, you may instruct your broker to vote your shares by following the instructions that the broker provides to you. Most brokers allow you to authorize your proxy by mail, telephone and on the Internet.
 
Q: | How do I attend the Annual Meeting?
 
A: | All stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. An admission ticket, or an account statement showing your ownership of our common stock as of the Record Date, and some form of photo identification (such as a valid driver’s license or passport) will be required for admission to the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders who own Company common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date and invited guests will be entitled to attend the Annual Meeting. Your proxy card will serve as your admission ticket and as verification of your ownership.
 
Q: | Why did I not receive my proxy materials in the mail?
 
A: | As permitted by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are making this proxy statement and our 2016 annual report, which includes our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (“Annual Report”), available to our stockholders electronically via the Internet. The “e-proxy” process expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials and lowers the costs and reduces the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.
On or about March 22, 2017, we mailed to stockholders of record, as of the close of business on the Record Date, the Notice containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement, our Annual Report and other soliciting materials via the Internet. If you received the Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail unless you had previously indicated that you wanted to receive a printed copy. The Notice instructs you on how to access the proxy statement and Annual Report and how you may submit your proxy.
 
Q: | Will there be any other items of business on the agenda?
 
A: | The board of directors does not know of any other matters that may be brought before the Annual Meeting nor does it foresee or have reason to believe that proxy holders will have to vote for substitute or alternate nominees for election to the board of directors. In the event that any other matter should come before the Annual Meeting or any nominee is not available for election, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect to such matters in accordance with their discretion.
 
Q: | Will anyone contact me regarding this vote?
 
A: | No arrangements or contracts have been made with any solicitors as of the date of this proxy statement, although we reserve the right to engage solicitors if we deem them necessary. Such solicitations may be made by mail, telephone, facsimile, e-mail or in person.
 
2

Table of Contents
Q: | Who has paid for this proxy solicitation?
 
A: | We pay for the cost of preparing, printing and mailing the Notice and, to the extent requested by our stockholders, the proxy materials and any additional materials furnished to stockholders. Proxies may be solicited by our directors or our officers or by officers of AG REIT Management, LLC (our “Manager”) personally or by telephone without additional compensation for such activities. We will also request persons, firms and corporations holding shares in their names or in the names of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, to send appropriate solicitation materials to such beneficial owners, and we will pay such holders their standard and ordinary fees. We will also reimburse such holders for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
 
Q: | May stockholders ask questions at the Annual Meeting?
 
A: | Yes. There will be time allotted at the end of the meeting when our representatives will answer questions from the floor.
 
Q: | What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice?
 
A: | It probably means your shares are registered differently and are in more than one account. Sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all your shares are voted.
 
Q: | What if I return a signed proxy or voting instruction card, but do not specify how my shares are to be voted?
 
A: | If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy, but you do not provide voting instructions, all of your shares will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4.
If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide the broker or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, the broker or other nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), brokers and other nominees have the discretion to vote on routine matters, such as Proposal 2, but do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters, such as Proposals 1, 3 and 4. Therefore, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your broker or other nominee may only vote your shares on Proposal 2 and any other routine matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.
 
Q: | How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?
 
A: | Under NYSE rules, brokers or other nominees who hold shares for a beneficial owner have the discretion to vote on a limited number of “routine” proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker or other nominee does not receive such voting instructions and does not have the discretion to vote the shares. The uncontested election of directors, the advisory vote on executive compensation and the vote on the approval of the Charter Amendment are not considered “routine” matters for which brokers have discretionary authority to vote shares held by account holders. Pursuant to Maryland law, abstentions and broker non-votes are not included in the determination of the shares of common stock voting on such matters, but are counted for quorum purposes.
 
Q: | Can I change my vote after I have voted?
 
A: | Yes. Proxies properly submitted over the Internet, by mail or by telephone do not preclude a stockholder from voting in person at the Annual Meeting. A stockholder may revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise by filing a duly executed revocation of proxy with our corporate secretary by properly submitting, either by Internet, mail or telephone, a proxy to our corporate secretary bearing a later date or by appearing at the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not by itself constitute revocation of a proxy.
 
Q: | Can I find additional information on the Company’s web site?
 
A: | Yes. Our web site (the “Company’s Web Site”) is located at www.agmit.com. Although the information contained on the Company’s Web Site is not part of this proxy statement, you can view additional information on the Company’s Web Site, such as our corporate governance guidelines, our code of business conduct and ethics, charters of our board committees and reports that we file with the SEC.
 
3

Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our board of directors currently consists of seven members. Each director serves a one-year term and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. The term for each director expires at each annual meeting of stockholders.
Our nominating and corporate governance committee analyzes the composition of our board of directors each year. In connection with this review, the nominating and corporate governance committee concluded that each of our current board members should be nominated to serve another term. Accordingly, our board of directors agreed with all of these conclusions.
At the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected to serve until the 2018 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Our board of directors has nominated the following current directors, David N. Roberts, Jonathan Lieberman, Frank Stadelmaier, Arthur Ainsberg, Andrew L. Berger, Joseph LaManna and Peter Linneman (each a “Nominee,” and, collectively, the “Nominees”), to serve as directors until the 2018 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The board of directors anticipates that, if elected, each Nominee will serve as a director. However, if any Nominee is unable to accept election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person or persons as the board of directors may recommend.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
The voting requirements for this proposal are described above and in the “Questions and Answers” section.
 
4

Table of Contents
DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Information Regarding Director Nominees
We believe that all of the Nominees are intelligent, collegial, insightful, proactive with respect to management and risk oversight, diligent and exercise good judgment. The biographical descriptions below set forth certain information with respect to each Nominee for election as a director at the Annual Meeting, including the age of each Nominee as of the date of this proxy statement, and the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of each Nominee that led us to conclude that such person should serve as a director.

David N. Roberts
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer
 
Age: 55

Mr. Roberts joined Angelo, Gordon in 1993 and is Head of Strategy. He is a Senior Managing Director and a member of the firm’s executive committee. At Angelo, Gordon, Mr. Roberts has been responsible for helping start and grow a number of the firm’s businesses, including opportunistic real estate, private equity, net lease real estate, residential mortgage-backed securities and energy lending. Within private equity, Mr. Roberts has focused in particular on investments in the specialty finance area, including Angelo, Gordon’s investment in PRA Group, Inc. (formerly Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.), a leading publicly traded acquiror of unpaid and normal-course accounts receivable, where he serves as lead director of the board. Prior to Angelo, Gordon, Mr. Roberts was a Principal at Gordon Investment Corporation, a Canadian merchant bank, from 1989 to 1993, where he participated in a wide variety of principal transactions. He also worked in the Corporate Finance Department at L.F. Rothschild where he specialized in mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Roberts has a B.S. degree from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. He serves as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer and has served as a director of the Company since 2011.
 
Due to his senior management and finance experience and his experience as a director of public and private boards, we believe Mr. Roberts should serve as a member of our board of directors.

Jonathan Lieberman
 
President and Director
 
Age: 53

Mr. Lieberman joined Angelo, Gordon in June 2008 as head of the firm’s residential mortgage securities business and in 2017 became Co-Head of the firm’s Structured Credit Platform. He is a Managing Director and a member of the firm’s executive committee. Prior to joining Angelo, Gordon, Mr. Lieberman worked from April 1997 to June 2008 at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. ultimately as a Senior Managing Director in the Strategic Finance/Financial Institutions Group, primarily focused on the Specialty Finance Sector. Before that, Mr. Lieberman was a Senior Analyst in the Structured Finance Group of Moody’s Investors Service and an attorney in the New York and Los Angeles offices of the law firm Dewey Ballantine LLP, where he specialized in securities law and structured finance. Mr. Lieberman holds a B.A. degree from Vassar College and a J.D. degree from Hofstra University School of Law. He is also on the Board of Managers for Arc Home LLC. He serves as our President and has served as a director of the Company since 2011.
 
Due to his vast industry and management experience, we believe Mr. Lieberman should serve as a member of our board of directors.

Frank Stadelmaier
 
Director
 
Age: 42

Mr. Stadelmaier joined Angelo, Gordon in July 2008 and is the firm’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Stadelmaier served as our Chief Financial Officer from the date of our initial public offering until September 4, 2013. Previously, Mr. Stadelmaier was a Senior Manager at Ernst & Young LLP from 1997 to 2008 where he served clients in the real estate and financial services industries. Mr. Stadelmaier is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a B.S. degree from the State University of New York at Albany. He has served as a director of the Company since 2012.
 
Due to his broad experience in accounting and real estate finance, together with his management experience, we believe Mr. Stadelmaier should serve as a member of our board of directors.

Arthur Ainsberg
 
Independent Director
 
Age: 70
 
Committees:
• Audit (Chair)
• Compensation

Mr. Ainsberg currently serves as a director of Medley Capital Corporation, a closed-end, externally managed financial services company that trades on the New York Stock Exchange, where he is the lead independent director, the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Previously, Mr. Ainsberg served as Chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Compliance Committee of the board of directors of Nomura Securities International, Inc. (the U.S. based broker-dealer of The Nomura Group) from 1996 through December 2014. In September 2012, Mr. Ainsberg was named to the board of directors of Nomura Global Financial Products, Inc., and in July 2013, he was named to the board of directors of Nomura Holding America, Inc. He served on each board through December 2014. From July 2003 until May 2012, Mr. Ainsberg served as a director of National Financial Partners Corporation, an independent financial

5

Table of Contents
| | services distribution company. From August 2009 until June 2011, Mr. Ainsberg served as Chief Operating Officer of Lehman Brothers Inc. in liquidation. From December 2003 until July 2009, Mr. Ainsberg served as the Independent Consultant for Morgan Stanley & Co. under the Global Research Settlement and was responsible for selecting and monitoring the providers of independent research for clients of Morgan Stanley. Previously, Mr. Ainsberg was Chief Operating Officer at two investment partnerships, Brahman Capital Corp. from 1996 to 2000 and Bessent Capital Corp. during 2001. He also served as Chairman of the New York State Board for Public Accountancy from 1999 to 2000 and was a member of that board from 1993 to 2001. From 1998 to 2000, he was also a member of the Board of District 10 of the National Association of Securities Dealers. He has served as a director of the Company since 2013.
| | Due to his over 40 years of experience in the financial services industry, his deep understanding of accounting matters for public financial services companies and his experience as a board member of a large U.S.-based broker-dealer, we believe Mr. Ainsberg should serve as a member of our board of directors.

Andrew L. Berger
 
Independent Director
 
Age: 70
 
Committees:
• Nominating and
  Corporate
  Governance (Chair)
• Audit

Mr. Berger was vice chairman of the executive committee of Sterne, Agee & Leach, a registered broker-dealer and a member of the NYSE, from 2007 until 2009. From 2003 until 2006, he was a Senior Managing Director of C.E. Unterberg, Towbin, a U.S. investment bank. Mr. Berger has also held senior positions in financial institutions in New York, London and Geneva, and has practiced law in New York and Paris. He is now an independent consultant. Mr. Berger was a member of the board of directors of Thermadyne Holdings Corp., a NASDAQ listed company from 2003 until the sale of the company in December 2010. He served as chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee and as a member of the compensation committee. He also has served as a member of the Board of Governors of the National Association of Securities Dealers. Mr. Berger has a bachelor’s degree in finance from Lehigh University and a J.D. degree from Columbia University. He has served as a director of the Company since 2011.
 
Due to the depth of his experience as a member of senior management at various investment banking and financial management institutions, and his experience on public and private boards, we believe Mr. Berger should serve as a member of our board of directors.

Joseph LaManna
 
Lead Independent Director
 
Age: 57
 
Committees:
• Compensation
  (Chair)
• Audit
• Nominating and
  Corporate
  Governance

Mr. LaManna worked at William Blair & Company, LLC from 1987 until his retirement in 2005. During his tenure at William Blair, he served in several different roles, including senior specialty finance analyst, head of the business services group, and director of research. In addition, he was a member of the firm’s executive committee, equity capital markets committee and audit committee for four years. Mr. LaManna has served on the boards of directors of several privately-held companies in the financial services industry. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst, and he holds a B.A. degree in economics and business administration from Knox College and an M.B.A. degree in finance from The University of Chicago. He has served as a director of the Company since 2011.
 
Due to his extensive financial and investment experience, as well as his experience as a director for several other financial services companies, we believe Mr. LaManna should serve as a member of our board of directors.

Peter Linneman
 
Independent Director
 
Age: 66
 
Committees:
• Compensation
• Nominating and
  Corporate
  Governance

Dr. Linneman is currently the Emeritus Albert Sussman Professor of Real Estate, Finance, and Public Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Business where he has been on the faculty since 1979. At Wharton, he was the Director of the Samuel Zell and Robert Lurie Real Estate Center from 1986-1998 and the Chairperson of the Wharton Real Estate Department from 1994-1997. He holds both a masters and a doctorate degree in economics from the University of Chicago. Dr. Linneman is also the founding principal of Linneman Associates, a real estate advisory firm, and the CEO of American Land Funds and KL Realty Fund, private real estate acquisition firms. He currently serves on the board of directors of Atrium European Real Estate Ltd. (VIE: ATRS), a public European real estate company, Regency Centers Corporation (NYSE: REG), Paramount Group, Inc. (NYSE: PGRE) and Equity Commonwealth (NYSE: EQC), each of which is a public real estate investment trust. Dr. Linneman joined the board of Regency Centers Corporation when Equity One, Inc., where he was a director since 2000, merged with and into Regency Centers Corporation on March 1, 2017. Additionally, Dr. Linneman has notified Atrium European Real Estate Ltd. that he will not stand for re-election as a board member at its next annual general meeting in April 2017. Dr. Linneman has served on over 20 public and private company boards, including as a director of eight New York Stock Exchange listed companies. He has served as a director of the Company since 2011.

6

Table of Contents
| | Due to his extensive academic and business experience in real estate, his understanding of complex financial structures and his experience as a member of several public and private boards, including many real estate investment companies, we believe Dr. Linneman should serve as a member of our board of directors.
Biographical Information Regarding Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors
The following is a list of individuals serving as executive officers of the Company. All of our executive officers serve at the discretion of the board of directors or the chief executive officer.

Brian C. Sigman
 
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
 
Age: 39

Mr. Sigman was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer on September 4, 2013 and serves as a Managing Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Angelo, Gordon’s Structured Credit Platform. Previously, he was the Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer of Newcastle Investment Corp. (“Newcastle”) from August 2008 to May 2013. He was also a Managing Director of Newcastle’s external manager, an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC. Mr. Sigman served as Vice President of Finance of Newcastle from 2006 to 2008 and as Assistant Controller from 2003 through 2006. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Sigman was a Senior Auditor at Ernst & Young LLP. He has served as an executive officer of the Company since 2013.

Andrew Parks
 
Chief Risk Officer
 
Age: 44

Mr. Parks joined Angelo, Gordon in August 2009 as Chief Risk Officer. Before joining Angelo, Gordon, Mr. Parks was associated with Morgan Stanley where he served as an Executive Director overseeing the risk management group for the ultra high net worth division in the U.S. and Latin America. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Parks worked as a corporate attorney at Cravath, Swaine & Moore in New York in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity capital markets, secured corporate credit and real estate acquisition/finance. Mr. Parks holds a B.A. degree from Tulane University and a J.D. degree from The University of Texas School of Law. He has served as an executive officer of the Company since 2011.

Raul E. Moreno
 
General Counsel and Secretary
 
Age: 36

Mr. Moreno joined Angelo, Gordon in November 2015 as Senior Counsel and was appointed as our General Counsel and Secretary on November 24, 2015. Prior to joining Angelo, Gordon, Mr. Moreno was a Senior Associate at Kaye Scholer LLP from 2010 to 2015 where he focused on private equity, M&A, securities, and corporate governance matters. Prior to that, Mr. Moreno was a private equity associate at both Ropes & Gray LLP and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP. Before law school, Mr. Moreno worked as a technology investment banker in Morgan Stanley’s Silicon Valley office. Mr. Moreno graduated  magna cum laude  from Harvard University with an A.B. degree in economics and from Stanford Law School where he earned his J.D. He has served as an executive officer of the Company since 2015.

Our executive officers are elected by the board of directors for an initial term which continues until the board meeting immediately following the next annual statutory meeting of stockholders, and thereafter are elected for a term ending at the following year’s board meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified. All of our executive officers and Mr. Stadelmaier are employed by Angelo, Gordon in various executive, managerial and administrative positions.
 
7

Table of Contents
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board of Directors and Committees
Our Manager manages our day-to-day operations, subject to the supervision of our board of directors. Our Manager, pursuant to a delegation agreement dated as of June 29, 2011, has delegated to Angelo, Gordon the overall responsibility with respect to our Manager’s day-to-day duties and obligations arising under our management agreement. Members of our board of directors are kept informed of our business through discussions with our Manager’s executive officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the board of directors and its committees. A majority of the members of our board of directors are “independent,” as determined by the requirements of the NYSE and the regulations of the SEC. Our directors also keep informed about our business through supplemental reports and communications. Our independent directors meet in executive sessions without the presence of our corporate officers or non-independent directors.
Our board of directors has formed an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee and has adopted charters for each of these committees. Each of these committees has three directors and is composed exclusively of independent directors, as defined by the listing standards of the NYSE and, as it relates to the audit committee, Rule 10A-3(b)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Moreover, the compensation committee is composed exclusively of individuals intended to be, to the extent provided by Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, non-employee directors and will, at such times as we are subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), qualify as outside directors for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.
Board Leadership
Our business is conducted day-to-day by our officers and our Manager, under the direction of our chief executive officer and the oversight of our board of directors, to enhance our long-term value for our stockholders. Our board of directors is elected by our stockholders to oversee our officers and our Manager and to assure that the long-term interests of the stockholders are being served.
The board of directors annually appoints a chairman of the board, who may or may not be our chief executive officer. If the individual appointed as chairman of the board is our chief executive officer, the board of directors will also appoint a lead independent director. David N. Roberts has served as chief executive officer of the Company since our initial public offering in 2011 and as chairman of the board since the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders. In these capacities, Mr. Roberts is involved in both our day-to-day operations and the strategic decision making at the board level.
We believe that it is in the best interests of our stockholders for Mr. Roberts to serve as both chairman of the board and chief executive officer because of his decisive, consistent and effective leadership. We also believe that having a lead independent director mitigates the risk that having our chief executive officer serve as our chairman may cause management to have undue influence on our board of directors. Joseph LaManna serves as our lead independent director. Our lead independent director chairs executive sessions of the independent directors of the board, and meetings of the full board of directors when the chairman is absent, and otherwise serves as a liaison between the independent directors, the full board of directors and management.
The board of directors recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to evaluate and determine its optimal leadership structure so as to provide independent oversight of management. The board of directors understands that there is no single, generally accepted approach to providing board leadership and the right board leadership structure may vary as circumstances warrant. Consistent with this understanding, our independent directors consider the board’s leadership structure on an annual basis.
Director Independence
Under the corporate governance standards of the NYSE, at least a majority of our directors, and all of the members of our audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees, must be “independent,” as such term is defined in the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The NYSE standards provide that to qualify as an “independent” director, in addition to satisfying certain bright-line criteria, the board of directors must affirmatively determine that a director has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us). Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that each of Arthur Ainsberg, Andrew L. Berger, Joseph LaManna and Peter Linneman satisfies the bright-line independence criteria of the NYSE and that none has a relationship with us that would interfere with such person’s ability to exercise independent judgment as a member of the board of directors. Therefore, we believe that all of these directors, who constitute a majority of our board of directors, are independent under the NYSE rules.
 
8

Table of Contents
We have implemented procedures for interested parties, including stockholders, to communicate directly with our independent directors. We believe that providing a method for interested parties to communicate directly with our independent directors, rather than the full board of directors, provides a more confidential, candid and efficient method of relaying any interested party’s concerns or comments. See “Communication with the Board of Directors and Independent Directors.”
Nomination of Directors
Before each annual meeting of stockholders, the nominating and corporate governance committee considers the nomination of all directors whose terms expire at the next annual meeting of stockholders and also considers new candidates whenever there is a vacancy on the board of directors or whenever a vacancy is anticipated due to a change in the size or composition of the board of directors, a retirement of a director or for any other reasons. The nominating and corporate governance committee identifies director candidates based on recommendations from directors, stockholders, management and others. The committee may in the future engage the services of third-party search firms to assist in identifying or evaluating director candidates. No such firm was engaged in 2016.
Our nominating and corporate governance committee charter provides that the nominating and corporate governance committee will consider nominations for board membership by stockholders. The rules that must be followed to submit nominations are contained in our bylaws and include the following: (i) the nomination must be received by the committee at least 120 days, but not more than 150 days, before the first anniversary of the mailing date for proxy materials applicable to the annual meeting prior to the annual meeting for which such nomination is proposed for submission and (ii) the nominating stockholder must submit certain information regarding the director nominee, including the nominee’s written consent.
The nominating and corporate governance committee evaluates annually the effectiveness of the board of directors as a whole and of each individual director and identifies any areas in which the board of directors would be better served by adding new members with different skills, backgrounds or areas of experience. The board of directors considers director candidates, including those nominated by stockholders, based on a number of factors including: whether the board member will be “independent,” as such term is defined by the NYSE listing standards; whether the candidate possesses the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; whether the candidate contributes to the overall diversity of the board of directors; and whether the candidate has an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. Candidates are also evaluated on their understanding of our business, experience and willingness to devote adequate time to carrying out their duties. The nominating and corporate governance committee also monitors the mix of skills, experience and background to assure that the board of directors has the necessary composition to effectively perform its oversight function.
We do not have a formal policy about diversity, but the nominating and corporate governance committee does consider certain types of diversity when nominating director candidates to the board of directors, including differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other personal qualities and attributes.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our board of directors has also adopted corporate governance guidelines, which are available in the corporate governance section of the Company’s Web Site. These guidelines set forth the practices the board of directors follows with respect to, among other matters, the composition of the board of directors, director responsibilities, board committees, director access to officers, the Manager and independent advisors, director compensation and performance evaluation of the board of directors.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our board of directors has established a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our officers and directors as well as the employees, officers and directors of our affiliates who provide us services (the “Code of Ethics”). Among other matters, our Code of Ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
 
| • | | honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
 
| • | | accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable disclosure in our SEC reports and other public communications;
 
| • | | compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
 
| • | | prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics to appropriate persons identified in the Code of Ethics; and
 
| • | | accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics.
 
9

Table of Contents
Any waiver of the Code of Ethics may be made only by our board of directors or one of our board committees. The Code of Ethics is posted in the corporate governance section of the Company’s Web Site. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of the Code of Ethics by posting such information on the Company’s Web Site.
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The board of directors is responsible for overseeing our risk management policies and practices. Our executive officers, who are responsible for our day-to-day risk management practices, regularly present to the board of directors on our overall risk profile and the processes by which such risks are mitigated. Our Manager also regularly reports to the board on various matters related to our risk exposure. Through regular and consistent communication, our Manager provides reasonable assurances to our board of directors that all of our material operational and investment risks, including among others, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and capital market risk, are being addressed.
Board Meetings and Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The board of directors held eight meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings) in 2016, and each director attended at least 75% of the board meetings and each director’s respective committee meetings. We have a policy that directors attend each annual meeting of stockholders; however, some or all of our directors may be unable to attend the Annual Meeting due to scheduling conflicts or other obligations that may arise. All of our directors attended the 2016 annual meeting. The independent directors meet in executive session at least once per year during a regularly scheduled board meeting without management. As lead director, Mr. LaManna, a non-executive and an independent director, presides at the executive sessions of the independent directors.
Committee Membership
The current committees of the board of directors are the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee. The table below provides current membership information.
 
Director | | Audit | | | Compensation | | | Nominating and Corporate Governance |
Arthur Ainsberg | | | | | | | | | | | — |
Andrew L. Berger | | | | | | | — | | | | |
Joseph LaManna | | | | | | | | | | | |
Peter Linneman | | | — | | | | | | | | |
 
 — Member
 — Chairman
Board Committees
Below is a description of each committee of the board of directors. The board of directors has affirmatively determined that each committee consists entirely of independent directors pursuant to rules established by the NYSE and rules promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consists of Messrs. Ainsberg, LaManna and Berger, each of whom is an independent director and “financially literate” under the rules of the NYSE. Mr. Ainsberg chairs our audit committee and serves as our audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined by the SEC. Our audit committee assists the board of directors in overseeing:
 
| • | | our accounting and financial reporting processes;
 
| • | | the integrity and audits of our consolidated financial statements;
 
| • | | our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
 
| • | | the qualifications and independence of our independent auditors; and
 
| • | | the performance of our independent and internal auditors.
 
10

Table of Contents
Our audit committee is responsible for engaging independent registered public accounting firms, reviewing with the independent registered public accountants the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accountants, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accountants, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.
The audit committee held six meetings in 2016.
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee consists of Messrs. LaManna, Ainsberg and Linneman, each of whom is an independent director under the rules of the NYSE. Mr. LaManna chairs our compensation committee. The responsibilities of our compensation committee include evaluating the performance of our executive officers, reviewing the compensation of our executive officers, evaluating the performance of our Manager, reviewing the equity compensation and fees payable to our Manager under the management agreement, administering our equity incentive plans and any other compensation plans, policies and programs, discharging the board of director’s responsibilities relating to compensation payable to our independent directors and reviewing and recommending to the board of directors compensation structure, policies and programs. No executive officer of the Company is involved in determining or recommending non-executive director compensation levels.
The compensation committee held five meetings in 2016.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Messrs. Berger, LaManna and Linneman, each of whom is an independent director under the rules of the NYSE. Mr. Berger chairs our nominating and corporate governance committee. Our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for seeking, considering and recommending to our board of directors qualified candidates for election as directors and recommending a slate of nominees for election as directors at each annual meeting of stockholders. The committee also recommends to our board of directors the appointment of each of our executive officers. It also periodically prepares and submits to our board of directors for adoption the committee’s selection criteria for director nominees. It reviews and makes recommendations on matters involving the general operation of our board of directors and our corporate governance and annually recommends to our board of directors the nominees for each committee of the board of directors. In addition, the committee annually conducts an evaluation of our board of directors performance.
The nominating and corporate governance committee held five meetings in 2016.
Other Committees
Our board of directors may from time to time establish other committees to facilitate the management of the Company.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our minimum share ownership guidelines for directors became effective in February 2014 and require that each director acquire and maintain a minimum equity investment in our company of 6,000 shares of our common stock by no later than January 2, 2017. Any director elected after the minimum share ownership guidelines became effective must be compliant within three years of the date of his or her election. From time to time, the nominating and corporate governance committee of the board of directors will review each director’s compliance with the guidelines and may grant exceptions to the guidelines as it deems appropriate and market-competitive on a case-by-case basis. All of our directors are currently in compliance with the minimum share ownership guidelines.
Our minimum share ownership guidelines for executive officers became effective in February 2014 and require that our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Financial Officer acquire and maintain a minimum equity investment in our company of 15,000 shares of our common stock by no later than January 2, 2017. Any executive officer elected to an office subject to the minimum share ownership guidelines after the minimum share ownership guidelines became effective must be compliant within three years of the date of his or her election. Until the minimum equity investment is met, an executive officer subject to the guidelines must retain all of our common stock granted to him or her as compensation. From time to time, the nominating and corporate governance committee of the board of directors will review each executive officer’s compliance with the guidelines and may grant exceptions to the guidelines as it deems appropriate and market-competitive on a case-by-case basis. All of our executive officers subject to the minimum share ownership guidelines are currently in compliance therewith.
 
11

Table of Contents
Policy Prohibiting Pledging and Hedging of Our Securities
Our Policy Prohibiting Pledging and Hedging of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. Securities, which became effective in February 2014, applies to each of our directors and officers, and states that each such person is prohibited from (i) making or maintaining any pledges of our securities or otherwise holding our securities in a margin account and (ii) engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to our securities, including, without limitation, the use of financial instruments, such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Our compensation committee is comprised solely of the following independent, non-employee directors: Messrs. LaManna, Ainsberg and Linneman. None of the members of our compensation committee is or has been an employee or officer of us or any of our affiliates. None of our executive officers currently serves, or during the past fiscal year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of another entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.
Communication with the Board of Directors and Independent Directors
Our board of directors or any individual director may be contacted by any party via mail at the address listed below:
Board of Directors
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
245 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10167
Attn: Secretary
We believe that providing a method for interested parties to communicate directly with our independent directors, rather than the full board of directors, provides a confidential, candid and efficient method of relaying any interested party’s concerns or comments. As discussed above, our lead independent director is Mr. LaManna. The independent directors can be contacted by any party via mail at the address listed below:
Independent Directors
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
245 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10167
Attn: Secretary
The Company does not screen mail except when warranted for security purposes, and all letters will be forwarded to our board of directors, any specified committee or individual directors.
 
12

Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The audit committee of our board of directors has recommended the accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for reappointment as our independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017, subject to ratification of this appointment by our stockholders. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as our independent registered public accountants since our initial public offering in July 2011 and is considered by our management to be well qualified.
We expect that a representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will also be available to respond to appropriate questions.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017.
The voting requirements for this proposal are described above and in the “Questions and Answers” section.
 
13

Table of Contents
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS
Fee Disclosure
The following is a summary of the fees billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
| | Fiscal Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 |
Audit Fees | | $ | 1,145,682 | | | $ | 1,130,000 |
Audit-Related Fees | | | — | | | | — |
Tax Fees | | | 185,239 | | | | 184,966 |
All Other Fees | | | — | | | | — |
Total | | $ | 1,330,921 | | | $ | 1,314,966 |
Audit Fees
“Audit Fees” consist of fees and expenses billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the financial statements and services that are normally provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit Fees include fees for professional services rendered in connection with quarterly and annual financial statements and fees and expenses related to the issuance of consents and comfort letters by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP related to our public offerings and registration statements. In 2016 and 2015, fees and expenses related to the issuance of consents and comfort letters included in the total Audit Fees were $0 and $10,000, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
“Audit-Related Fees” consist of fees and related expenses for products and services other than services described under “Audit Fees” and “Tax Fees.” PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP did not provide any such products or services for us during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Tax Fees
“Tax Fees” consist of fees and related expenses billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services included assistance regarding federal and state tax compliance and tax planning and structuring.
All Other Fees
“All Other Fees” consist of fees and expenses for products and services that are not “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” or “Tax Fees.” In 2016 and 2015, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP did not provide any such other products or services.
Pre-Approval Policy
All audit, tax and other services provided to us were reviewed and pre-approved by the audit committee. The audit committee concluded that the provision of such services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions. Circumstances may arise during the following twelve-month period when it may become necessary to engage PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to provide additional services or additional effort that were not contemplated in the original pre-approval by the audit committee.
 
14

Table of Contents
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The audit committee has furnished the following report to stockholders of the Company in accordance with rules adopted by the SEC.
The Company’s management has primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting, preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and managing the public reporting process. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (“PwC”), is responsible for forming and expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, in all material respects, and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The audit committee reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, including a discussion of the acceptability and appropriateness of significant accounting policies and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The audit committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm matters related to the conduct of the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The audit committee also reviewed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments made in preparing the consolidated financial statements, as well as the clarity of the disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and related notes.
The audit committee has discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T. These discussions included, among other things:
 
| • | | The independent registered public accounting firm’s judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles as applied in the Company’s consolidated financial statements;
 
| • | | The critical accounting policies and practices used by the Company;
 
| • | | Any alternative treatments within U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for policies and practices related to material items that have been discussed with management, including ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments and the treatment preferred by the independent registered public accounting firm;
 
| • | | Methods used to account for significant or unusual transactions;
 
| • | | The effect of significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus;
 
| • | | The process used by management in formulating particularly sensitive accounting estimates and the basis for the firm’s conclusions regarding the reasonableness of these estimates;
 
| • | | Any disagreements with management over the application of accounting principles, the basis for management’s accounting estimates, and the disclosures in the consolidated financial statements;
 
| • | | Any audit adjustments and any uncorrected consolidated financial statement misstatements; and
 
| • | | Other material written communications between the independent registered public accounting firm and management.
The audit committee has also received written communications from PwC as required by the PCAOB Rules, including Rule 3526, “Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence,” and has discussed with PwC their independence. In connection with those discussions, PwC advised the audit committee that it identified an issue related to its independence under Rule 2-01 (c)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (referred to as the “Loan Rule”).
The Loan Rule specifically provides that an accounting firm would not be independent if it receives a loan from an audit client or “record or beneficial owners of more than ten percent of the audit client’s equity securities” (referred to as a “more than ten percent owner”). For purposes of the Loan Rule, audit clients include the Company as well as all affiliates of the Manager, including other subsidiaries of the Manager’s parent company, Angelo, Gordon (collectively, the Angelo, Gordon Investment Complex). PwC informed us that it has relationships with lenders who hold, as record owner, more than ten percent of the shares of certain funds within the Angelo, Gordon Investment Complex, which may implicate the Loan Rule.
 
15

Table of Contents
On June 20, 2016, the SEC Staff issued a “no-action” letter to another mutual fund complex (see Fidelity Management & Research Company et al., No-Action Letter) related to the audit independence issue described above. In that letter, the SEC confirmed that it would not recommend enforcement action against a fund that relied on audit services performed by an audit firm that was not in compliance with the Loan Rule in certain specified circumstances. In connection with prior independence determinations, PwC communicated, as contemplated by the no-action letter, that it believes that it remains objective and impartial and that a reasonable investor possessing all the facts regarding its borrowing and audit relationships would conclude that PwC is able to exhibit the requisite objectivity and impartiality to report on the Company’s financial statements as the independent registered public accounting firm.
PwC also represented that it has complied with PCAOB Rule 3526 and affirmed that it is an independent accountant within the meaning of PCAOB Rule 3520. Therefore the audit committee concluded, and the board of directors confirmed, that PwC should continue as the Company’s independent public accounting firm. If a subsequent determination is made that PwC’s objectivity and impartiality has been impaired with respect to the planning for and execution of the Company’s audit, then the Company may no longer be able to continue to utilize PwC as the Company’s auditor and would need to obtain audit services from a different independent registered public accounting firm.
The audit committee reviewed with management the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and the acceptability and appropriateness of significant accounting policies. Based on the reviews and discussions described in this report, and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities of the audit committee referred to in this report and in the Company’s audit committee charter, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors (and the board of directors approved) that the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the SEC. The audit committee also selected and appointed PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and is presenting this appointment to the Company’s stockholders for ratification.
By the audit committee
Arthur Ainsberg (Chair)
Joseph LaManna
Andrew L. Berger
 
16

Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
At our 2012 annual meeting, we asked our stockholders to vote, on an advisory basis, to recommend the frequency with which we would provide future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation. At our 2012 annual meeting, 63% of our stockholders voted, on an advisory basis, to hold future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation each year. Taking into consideration the recommendation of the stockholders, our board of directors elected to hold advisory votes on named executive officer compensation each year. In the future, our board of directors may reconsider the frequency with which we hold advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.
Our board of directors is committed to corporate governance best practices and recognizes the significant interest of stockholders in executive compensation matters. We are providing this advisory vote as required pursuant to the rules of the SEC. We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall policies and practices that apply to the compensation of our named executive officers. We will ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the other related disclosure.”
While this vote is advisory and not binding on us or the compensation committee, it will provide information to us and the compensation committee regarding stockholder sentiment about our executive compensation policies and practices. Our board of directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders. To the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns, and the compensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
As described in detail under the heading “Executive Compensation” below, we are externally managed by AG REIT Management, LLC, our Manager, pursuant to the management agreement between our Manager and us. Our Manager, pursuant to a delegation agreement dated as of June 29, 2011, has delegated to Angelo, Gordon the overall responsibility with respect to our Manager’s day-to-day duties and obligations arising under our management agreement. In 2016, we did not have any employees whom we compensated directly with salaries, other cash compensation or stock-based compensation. A portion of our named executive officers’ compensation was paid out of funds from the management fees we pay to our Manager and the expense reimbursement we pay to our Manager. We have not paid, and do not intend to pay, any cash compensation to our named executive officers. We do not provide our named executive officers with pension benefits, termination payments or other incidental payments.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The voting requirements for this proposal are described in the “Questions and Answers” section above.
 
17

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our compensation program, objectives and policies for the executive officers named in this proxy statement and our executive officers generally.
Overview of Compensation Program
We have no employees. We are externally managed by our Manager, pursuant to a management agreement between our Manager and us. Because the management agreement provides that our Manager is responsible for managing our affairs, our executive officers, all of whom are employees of our Manager, or an affiliate of our Manager, do not receive cash compensation from us. Instead, our executive officers are compensated by our Manager, or an affiliate of our Manager, in part, with the management fee we pay to our Manager and with the expense reimbursement we provide to our Manager related to compensation. The management agreement provides for our reimbursement to the Manager of the allocable share of annual base salary, bonus, and any related withholding taxes and employee benefits paid to our chief financial officer, general counsel and other non-investment personnel based on the percentage of time those individuals spent on our affairs. We do not determine the compensation payable to personnel, including our executive officers, by our Manager or its affiliates. Our Manager or its affiliates, in their discretion, determine the levels of base salary, cash incentive compensation and other benefits earned by our executive officers. We have reported the compensation that we reimburse to our Manager for our named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table and in “Other Matters – Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” set forth below.
Cash and Other Compensation
Our named executive officers and other personnel who conduct our business are employees of our Manager or its affiliates. Accordingly, we do not pay or accrue any salaries or bonuses for our officers.
Equity-Based Compensation
Our compensation committee may, from time to time, grant equity awards in the form of restricted stock, stock options, restricted stock units or other types of awards to our Manager or to our named executive officers pursuant to our equity incentive plans. These awards are designed to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders by allowing our named executive officers to share in the creation of value for our stockholders through stock appreciation and dividends. These equity awards are generally subject to vesting requirements over a number of years and are designed to promote the retention of management and to achieve strong performance for our Company. These awards further provide flexibility to us in enabling our Manager to attract, motivate and retain talented individuals.
We believe our equity-based compensation policies are particularly appropriate since we are an externally managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. REIT regulations require us to pay at least 90% of our earnings to stockholders as dividends. As a result, we believe that our stockholders are principally interested in receiving attractive risk-adjusted dividends and growth in dividends and book value. Accordingly, we want to provide an incentive to our executive officers that rewards success in achieving these goals. Because we do not have the ability to retain a significant amount of earnings, we believe that equity-based awards serve to align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders in receiving attractive risk-adjusted dividends and growth. Additionally, we believe that equity-based awards are consistent with our stockholders’ interest in book value growth as these individuals will be incentivized to grow book value for stockholders over time. We believe that this alignment of interests provides an incentive to our executive officers to implement strategies that will enhance our long-term performance and promote growth in dividends and growth in book value.
Our equity incentive plans permit the granting of options to purchase shares of common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under the Code, and stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options. The exercise price of each stock option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our shares of common
 
18

Table of Contents
stock on the date of grant. The compensation committee will determine the terms of each option, including when each option may be exercised and the period of time, if any, after retirement, death, disability or termination of employment during which options may be exercised. Options become vested and exercisable in installments, and the exercisability of options may be accelerated by the compensation committee. To date, we have not granted any options under our equity plans.
Our equity incentive plans also permit the granting of shares of our common stock in the form of restricted common stock. A restricted common stock award is an award of shares of common stock that may be subject to forfeiture (vesting), restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions, if any, as the compensation committee may impose at the date of grant. The shares may vest and the restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, including, without limitation, a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of pre-established criteria, in such installments or otherwise, as our compensation committee may determine.
We may also grant unrestricted shares of common stock, which are shares of common stock awarded at no cost to the participant or for a purchase price determined by the compensation committee, under our equity incentive plans. The compensation committee may also grant restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, and other stock and non-stock-based awards under the equity incentive plans. These awards may be subject to such conditions and restrictions as the compensation committee may determine, including, but not limited to, the achievement of certain goals or continued service to us through a specific period. Each award under the plan may not be exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant.
Our equity incentive plans provide that in the event of a change of control of the Company, any award granted thereunder that was not previously vested shall become fully vested and/or payable, and any performance conditions imposed with respect to the awards shall be deemed to be fully achieved.
The compensation committee does not use a specific formula to calculate the number of equity awards and other rights awarded to executives under our incentive plans. Additionally, the compensation committee does not explicitly set future award levels on the basis of what the executives earned from prior awards. While the compensation committee will take past awards into account, it will not solely base future awards in view of those past awards. Generally, in determining the specific amounts to be granted to an individual, the compensation committee will take into account factors such as the individual’s position, his or her contribution to our Company, market practices, and the recommendations of our Manager. Neither we nor any committee of the board of directors retained any compensation consultants during 2016.
We have not and do not intend to either backdate stock options or grant stock options retroactively. Presently, we do not have designated dates on which we grant stock option awards. We do not intend to time stock options grants with our release of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation, other than performance-based compensation, over $1 million paid to the chief executive officer and next four highest compensated executive officers to the extent that compensation of a particular executive exceeds $1 million in any one year. There are certain exceptions for qualified performance-based compensation in accordance with the Code and corresponding regulations. We expect our Equity Incentive Plan awards paid to our executive officers will qualify as performance-based compensation deductible for federal income tax purposes under Section 162(m), but do not expect any non-performance based equity awards such as time vested restricted stock or stock units to qualify for such treatment. However, given the fact that we are presently externally managed by our Manager and the only compensation that currently may be paid to our executive officers are long-term incentive awards pursuant to our equity incentive plans, it is unlikely that Section 162(m) will have any material effect on us.
Compensation in 2016
We did not pay any compensation of any kind to our named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2016. We do not provide any of our executive officers with any cash compensation, pension benefits or nonqualified deferred compensation plans. We have reported the compensation that we reimburse to our Manager for our named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table set forth below.
 
19

Table of Contents
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, 58.2% of the management fee paid by the Company to the Manager, which was $5.7 million, was allocated to the compensation of our named executive officers for their service to us. Of this compensation, 4.3% was fixed and 95.7% was variable or incentive pay.
Our Manager and its affiliates do not use a specific formula to calculate the variable or incentive pay portion of our named executive officers’ compensation. Additionally, our Manager and its affiliates do not explicitly set future variable or incentive compensation on the basis of the compensation the named executive officers earned in prior years. Generally, in determining each executive’s variable or incentive pay, our Manager and its affiliates will take into account factors such as the individual’s position, his or her contribution to our Company, market practices, and the recommendations of our compensation committee. We did not, nor did our Manager or its affiliates, retain a compensation consultant in connection with the compensation of our named executive officers in 2016.
Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2016
We did not grant any shares of restricted stock, options, restricted stock units or other incentive compensation to our named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2016.
On July 1, 2014, we granted 60,000 restricted stock units to our Manager that represent the right to receive an equivalent number of shares of our common stock to be issued if and when the units vest. Annual vesting of approximately 20,000 units occurred or will occur on each of July 1, 2015, July 1, 2016, and July 1, 2017. The units do not entitle the participant to the rights of a holder of our common stock, such as dividend and voting rights, until shares are issued in settlement of the vested units.
On June 30, 2015, our Manager allocated 29,500 of our restricted stock units to certain of our named executive officers – 27,500 restricted stock units to Jonathan Lieberman, our President, and 2,000 restricted stock units to Brian C. Sigman, our Chief Financial Officer. On December 7, 2015, 1,407 of those restricted stock units were re-allocated to Raul E. Moreno, our General Counsel. Additionally, on June 30, 2016, 500 restricted stock units forfeited by employees of Angelo, Gordon were re-allocated to Jonathan Lieberman. Each allocation decision made by the Manager was reported to and discussed with our board of directors. As of December 31, 2016, approximately 20,000 total restricted stock units remained unvested with 10,083 of those unvested units allocated to our named executive officers.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
As of December 31, 2016, there were no outstanding awards of equity made to our named executive officers.
Options Exercised and Stock Vested
As of December 31, 2016, we had not issued any outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock to our named executive officers. No options to purchase shares of our common stock or restricted shares of common stock for any of our named executive officers vested in 2016.
Pension Benefits
We do not provide any of our named executive officers with pension benefits.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not provide any of our named executive officers with any nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Potential Payments Upon Termination Of Employment
We do not have any employment agreements with any of our named executive officers and are not obligated to make any payments to them upon termination of employment.
Potential Post-Employment Payments and Payments on a Change in Control
We do not have any employment agreements with any of our named executive officers and are not obligated to make any post-employment payments to them or any payments upon a change of control, except as described above related to the vesting of equity-based awards upon a change of control.
 
20

Table of Contents
Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to Risk Management
We did not pay any compensation of any kind to our named executive officers and did not have any employees during the year ended December 31, 2016. Therefore, our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. We pay our Manager a management fee that is a percentage of our stockholders’ equity, as that term is defined in the management agreement. We believe this management fee structure helps guard against our Manager making higher risk investments to achieve higher management fees as might be the case if the management fee was based on total assets or returns on investments. We have designed our compensation policy in an effort to provide the proper incentives to our executive officers and our Manager to maximize our performance in order to serve the best interests of our stockholders. These compensation policies and practices do not place undue emphasis on or incentivize the maximization of net income at the expense of other criteria, such as preservation of capital. Our board of directors monitors our compensation policies and practices to determine whether our risk management objectives are being met.
 
21

Table of Contents
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement with management of the Company. Based on that review and discussion, the compensation committee recommended to the board of directors (and the board of directors has approved) that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s proxy statement.
By the compensation committee
Joseph LaManna (Chair)
Arthur Ainsberg
Peter Linneman
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the Company’s allocable share of annual compensation reimbursed to our Manager for our current named executive officers in the 2016, 2015 and 2014 fiscal years. The named executive officers in the following table are the only executive officers of the Company for whom the Company reimbursed our Manager during those periods for a portion of their annual compensation.
 
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | | Salary ^(1) | | | Bonus ^(1) | | | Stock Awards ^(2) | | | All Other Compensation  ^(1)(3) | | | Total |
Brian C. Sigman | | | 2016 | | | $ | 130,000 | | | $ | 863,200 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 50,149 | | | $ | 1,043,349 |
Chief Financial Officer | | | 2015 | | | | 150,000 | | | | 1,009,500 | | | | — | | | | 47,190 | | | | 1,206,690 |
| | | 2014 | | | | 150,000 | | | | 1,006,500 | | | | — | | | | 47,130 | | | | 1,203,630 |
Andrew Parks | | | 2016 | | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | 120,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 140,000 |
Chief Risk Officer | | | 2015 | | | | 22,466 | | | | 123,562 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 146,028 |
| | | 2014 | | | | 24,959 | | | | 137,274 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 162,233 |
Raul E. Moreno ^(4) | | | 2016 | | | $ | 162,432 | | | $ | 162,432 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 37,672 | | | $ | 362,536 |
General Counsel | | | 2015 | | | | 28,493 | | | | 25,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 53,493 |
| | | 2014 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — |
 
(1) | Messrs. Sigman, Parks and Moreno are not our employees and are not paid compensation by us. Amounts in these columns for such individuals represent the share of the officers’ compensation which is allocable to us based on the percentage of time such officer spent managing our affairs in their capacity as named executive officers of the Company. The amounts set forth in the table above reflect the amounts we reimbursed to our Manager related to the compensation of our named executive officers.
(2) | We did not grant any stock-based awards in 2016 to our named executive officers, and we do not reimburse the Manager for any stock compensation that it provides to our named executive officers. No stock-based compensation that we grant to the Manager pursuant to our equity incentive plans is included in this column as compensation to our named executive officers although our Manager may subsequently elect to allocate some or all of the stock-based compensation that it receives under our equity incentive plans to our named executive officers. For a description of the stock awards allocated by our Manager to our named executive officers, see the “Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2016” section of this proxy statement.
(3) | Amounts in this column represent the costs of each named executive officer’s benefits allocable to us. These costs include premiums for health and life insurance, short and long term disability insurance, vision insurance, and profit sharing and are calculated by our Manager to be 20% and 3% of the annual salary and bonus, respectively, for such named executive officer.
(4) | Mr. Moreno was appointed as our General Counsel and Secretary effective November 24, 2015.
 
22

Table of Contents
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Director Compensation for 2016
Each member of our board of directors who is not an employee of our Manager or its affiliates received annual compensation for service as a director during 2016 as follows:
 
| • | | Each non-employee director received an annual base fee for services in the amount of $90,000, $60,000 of which is payable on a quarterly basis in cash, and $30,000 of which is payable on a quarterly basis in shares of restricted common stock that may not be sold or transferred during such director’s term of service on the board of directors.
 
| • | | The lead independent director received an additional annual fee of $15,000, payable in cash on a quarterly basis.
 
| • | | In addition, the chairman of our audit committee received an annual fee of $25,000, and the chairs of our compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees each received an annual fee of $10,000, each payable in cash on a quarterly basis.
Each member of our board of directors is also reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with service on our behalf and with attendance at or participation in board meetings or committee meetings, including reasonable travel expenses.
Non-employee directors participate in our Equity Incentive Plan. In the event of a change in control of our Company, all outstanding shares of restricted stock granted under the plan to our non-employee directors will become fully vested. Our board of directors (or a duly formed committee thereof) may revise our director compensation in its discretion.
The following table summarizes the compensation that we paid to our directors in 2016:
2016 Director Compensation Table
 
Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | | Stock Awards  ^(1) | | | Total |
Arthur Ainsberg | | $ | 85,025 | | | $ | 29,965 | | | $ | 114,990 |
Andrew L. Berger | | | 70,025 | | | | 29,965 | | | | 99,990 |
Joseph LaManna | | | 85,025 | | | | 29,965 | | | | 114,990 |
Peter Linneman | | | 60,025 | | | | 29,965 | | | | 89,990 |
David N. Roberts | | | — | | | | — | | | | — |
Jonathan Lieberman | | | — | | | | — | | | | — |
Frank Stadelmaier | | | — | | | | — | | | | — |
 
(1) | Stock awards for services in the fourth quarter of 2016 were granted as of the first business day following the end of such quarter.
At a meeting held November 3, 2016, our board of directors revised the annual compensation for service as director as follows, with such revision effective beginning with the 2017 fiscal year:
| • | | Each non-employee director will receive an annual base fee for services in the amount of $120,000, $60,000 of which is payable on a quarterly basis in cash, and $60,000 of which is payable on a quarterly basis in shares of restricted common stock that may not be sold or transferred during such director’s term of service on the board of directors.
Equity Incentive Plans Information
We have adopted equity incentive plans to provide incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified directors, officers, advisors, consultants and other personnel, including our Manager and its affiliates and personnel of our Manager and its affiliates to stimulate their efforts toward our continued success, long-term growth and profitability and to attract, reward and retain personnel.
 
23

Table of Contents
The following table presents certain information about our equity incentive plans as of December 31, 2016:
 
Plan Category | | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and  Rights | | | Weighted Average Exercise price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Incentive Plans  (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column of this Table) |
Equity Incentive Plans Approved by Stockholders | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 133,590 |
Equity Incentive Plans Not Approved by Stockholders | | | — | | | | — | | | | — |
Total | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 133,590 |

24

Table of Contents
COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP OF OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND SIGNIFICANT STOCKHOLDERS
Ownership of Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth, as of March 7, 2017, beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by each executive officer, each director, and by all directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership reported in the below table has been presented in accordance with SEC rules. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person under these rules, shares of common stock subject to warrants that are currently exercisable within 60 days after March 7, 2017 held by that person are deemed beneficially owned by that person. Unless otherwise indicated, all directors and executive officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown, and the address of each beneficial owner reported in the below table is c/o AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., 245 Park Avenue, 26 ^th  Floor, New York, New York 10167.
 
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Shares Beneficially Owned | | | Percent of Class  ^(1) |
David N. Roberts | | | 197,216 | | | | * |
Jonathan Lieberman | | | 137,939 | ^(2) | | | * |
Frank Stadelmaier | | | 6,000 | | | | * |
Brian C. Sigman | | | 30,633 | | | | * |
Raul E. Moreno | | | 704 | | | | * |
Andrew Parks | | | — | | | | * |
Arthur Ainsberg | | | 7,263 | | | | * |
Peter Linneman | | | 13,038 | ^(3) | | | * |
Andrew L. Berger | | | 16,821 | | | | * |
Joseph LaManna | | | 25,821 | ^(4) | | | * |
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons) | | | 435,435 | | | | 1.57 | %
 
* | Represents ownership of less than one percent.
(1) | As of March 7, 2017, we had 27,701,902 shares of our common stock outstanding.
(2) | Includes 15,000 shares owned by Jonathan Lieberman jointly with his spouse and 35,000 shares owned by a family foundation of which Jonathan Lieberman is a trustee.
(3) | All shares owned by Peter Linneman are held jointly with his spouse.
(4) | Includes 5,000 shares of common stock issuable in connection with warrants exercisable at $20.50 per share.
Ownership of Common Stock by Certain Significant Stockholders
As of March 7, 2017, unless otherwise indicated below, the following are beneficial owners of more than five percent of our outstanding common stock:
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Shares Beneficially Owned | | | Percent of Class  ^(1) |
BlackRock, Inc. 40 East 52^nd Street New York, NY 10022 | | | 2,605,021 | ^(2) | | | 9.4 | %
Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. 411 Borel Avenue, Suite 3000 San Mateo, CA 94402 | | | 2,415,745 | ^(3) | | | 8.7 | %
The Vanguard Group Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | | | 2,224,549 | ^(4) | | | 8.0 | %
 
(1) | As of March 7, 2017, we had 27,701,902 shares of our common stock outstanding.
 
25

Table of Contents
(2) | Information obtained solely by reference to the amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 19, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc., or BlackRock. Of the reported shares, BlackRock reported that it has sole voting power for 2,529,127 shares and sole dispositive power for 2,605,021 shares.
(3) | Information obtained solely by reference to the amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017 by Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc., or Fuller & Thaler. Of the reported shares, Fuller & Thaler reported that it has sole voting power for 2,372,645 shares and sole dispositive power for 2,415,745 shares.
(4) | Information obtained solely by reference to the amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017 by The Vanguard Group Inc., or Vanguard. Of the reported shares, Vanguard reported that it has sole voting power for 33,728 shares, shared voting power for 9,100 shares, sole dispositive power for 2,183,021 shares and shared dispositive power for 41,528 shares.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires our directors, certain executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of our outstanding common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. The SEC regulations require the Company to identify anyone who failed to file a required report or filed a late report during the most recent fiscal year. To the Company’s knowledge, with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, all applicable filings were timely filed.
 
26

Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 4: AMENDMENT OF CHARTER
Pursuant to Article VIII of the Articles of Amendment and Restatement (the “Charter”) of the Company, any amendment to the Charter is valid only if declared advisable by the board of directors and approved by the affirmative shareholder vote of a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. In addition, pursuant to Section 2-604(c) of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the board of directors, when proposing an amendment to the Charter, must first declare the amendment advisable and then direct that the proposed amendment be submitted for consideration at either an annual or a special meeting of the stockholders.
At its February 28, 2017 meeting, the board of directors carefully reviewed, considered and adopted the Charter Amendment to Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company, attached hereto as  Annex I , and determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company to adopt the Charter Amendment.
In order to make effective the Charter Amendment, the Board hereby submits the Charter Amendment for consideration to the stockholders of the Company. A summary of the Charter Amendment is set forth below.
Currently, Section 5.9 of the Charter reads:
“The Board of Directors shall have the exclusive power to adopt, alter or repeal any Bylaws of the Corporation upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors.”
The Charter Amendment deletes Section 5.9 in its entirety in order to remove the provision giving the board of directors the exclusive power to adopt, alter or repeal any Bylaws of the Company.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE CHARTER AMENDMENT.
The voting requirements for this proposal are described above and in the “Questions and Answers” section.
 
27

Table of Contents
OTHER MATTERS
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Our Manager is a subsidiary of Angelo, Gordon. Three of our directors, David Roberts, Jonathan Lieberman and Frank Stadelmaier, and all of our executive officers are employees of Angelo, Gordon or its affiliates.
To avoid any actual or perceived conflicts of interest with our Manager, our board of directors has approved investment guidelines and policies providing that an investment in any security structured or managed by our Manager and its affiliates, and any sale of our assets to our Manager and its affiliates or any entity managed by our Manager and its affiliates, will comply with all applicable law and the compliance policies of Angelo, Gordon and our Manager. Our independent directors have approved parameters within which our Manager and its affiliates may act as our counterparty and provide broker, dealer and lending services to us in order to enable transactions to occur in an orderly and timely manner. Angelo, Gordon and/or our Manager may in the future change then-existing, or adopt additional, conflicts of interest resolution policies and procedures. Our independent directors periodically review our Manager’s and Angelo, Gordon’s compliance with these conflicts of interest provisions.
Related Person Transaction Policy
Our board of directors has adopted a policy (the “Related Person Transaction Policy”) regarding the approval of any “related person transaction,” which is any transaction or series of transactions in which we or any of our subsidiaries is or are to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a “related person” (as defined under SEC rules) has a direct or indirect material interest. Under the Related Person Transaction Policy, a related person would need to promptly disclose to our Secretary or Assistant Secretary any related person transaction and all material facts about the transaction. Our Secretary or Assistant Secretary, in consultation with outside counsel, to the extent appropriate, would then assess and promptly communicate that information to the audit committee of our board of directors. Based on its consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the audit committee will review, approve or ratify such transactions as appropriate. The audit committee will not approve or ratify a related person transaction unless it shall have determined that such transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, our best interests and does not create a conflict of interest. If we become aware of an existing related person transaction that has not been approved under this policy, the transaction will be referred to the audit committee which will evaluate all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction. Our Related Person Transaction Policy requires any director who may be interested in a related person transaction to recuse himself or herself from any consideration of such related person transaction.
Affiliated Transactions Policy
Our board of directors has also adopted a policy (the “Affiliated Transactions Policy”) regarding the approval of any transactions with affiliates that are not “related persons,” as that term is defined in the Related Person Transaction Policy. The Affiliated Transactions Policy is meant to supplement the existing policies and procedures of the Related Person Transaction Policy. The Affiliated Transactions Policy applies to all transactions between Angelo, Gordon, or any entity or account ultimately managed by Angelo, Gordon, and us (an “Affiliated Transaction”). All Affiliated Transactions must be permitted within our investment guidelines, comply with applicable law, satisfy the requirements of Angelo, Gordon’s cross trade policy and comply with any other requirement deemed necessary by our General Counsel. On a quarterly basis, our management team delivers a complete list and appropriate supporting documentation of the Affiliated Transactions entered into during the quarter to the audit committee for its review. Based on its consideration of all the relevant facts and circumstances, the audit committee will confirm an Affiliated Transaction to our independent directors if, in its determination, such Affiliated Transaction is fair, reasonable and within the Affiliated Transactions Policy.
Management Agreement
We entered into a management agreement with AG REIT Management, LLC, our Manager, in connection with our initial public offering. Our management agreement with our Manager provides for the day-to-day management of our operations. Our Manager, pursuant to a delegation agreement dated as of June 29, 2011, has delegated to Angelo, Gordon the overall responsibility with respect to our Manager’s day-to-day duties and obligations arising under our management agreement.
 
28

Table of Contents
The management agreement requires our Manager to manage our business affairs in conformity with the investment policies that are approved and monitored by our board of directors. Pursuant to the terms of our management agreement, our Manager is obligated to supply us with our management team, including a chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief investment officer or similar positions, along with appropriate support personnel, to provide the management services to be provided by our Manager to us as described in the management agreement. Our Manager also provides personnel for service on the investment committee.
We are obligated to reimburse our Manager or its affiliates for the allocable share of the compensation, including, without limitation, annual base salary, bonus, any related withholding taxes and employee benefits paid to (1) our chief financial officer based on the percentage of his time spent on our affairs, (2) our general counsel based on the percentage of his time spent on our affairs, and (3) other corporate finance, tax, accounting, internal audit, legal risk management, operations, compliance and other non-investment personnel of our Manager and its affiliates who spend all or a portion of their time managing our affairs based upon the percentage of time devoted by such personnel to our affairs. In their capacities as officers or personnel of our Manager or its affiliates, they will devote such portion of their time to our affairs as is necessary to enable us to operate our business. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $6.0 million of reimbursable expenses payable to the Manager.
The initial term of the management agreement was three years, and is deemed renewed automatically each year for an additional one-year period, unless we or the Manager exercise their respective termination rights. As of the date hereof, no event of termination has occurred. Our Manager is entitled to receive a termination fee from us should the Management Agreement be terminated under certain circumstances.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, our Manager earned management fees of $9.8 million.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into customary indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers that obligate us to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law. The agreements require us to indemnify the director or officer, or the indemnitee, against all judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement and all expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the indemnitee or on his or her behalf in connection with a proceeding other than one initiated by or on our behalf. In addition, each indemnification agreement requires us to indemnify the indemnitee against all amounts paid in settlement and all expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the indemnitee or on his or her behalf in connection with a proceeding that is brought by or on our behalf. In either case, the indemnitee will not be entitled to indemnification if it is established that one of the prohibitions against indemnification under Maryland law exists.
In addition, each indemnification agreement requires us to advance reasonable expenses incurred by the indemnitee within ten days of the receipt by us of a statement from the indemnitee requesting the advance, provided the statement evidences the expenses and is accompanied by:
 
| • | | a written affirmation of the indemnitee’s good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification; and
 
| • | | a written undertaking by or on behalf of the indemnitee to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Each indemnification agreement also provides for procedures for the determination of entitlement to indemnification, including requiring that such determination be made by independent counsel, after a change of control of us.
 
29

Table of Contents
Asset Manager
In connection with our investments in residential loans and securitized whole loans, we may engage asset managers to provide advisory, consultation, asset management and other services to formulate and implement strategic plans to manage, collect and dispose of loans in a manner that is reasonably expected to maximize the amount of proceeds from each loan. Beginning in November 2015, we engaged Red Creek Asset Management LLC (“Asset Manager”), an affiliate of the Manager and a direct subsidiary of Angelo, Gordon, as the asset manager for certain of our residential loans and securitized whole loans. The Asset Manager acknowledges that we will at all times have and retain ownership and control of all loans and that the Asset Manager will not acquire (i) title to any loan, (ii) any security interest in any loan, or (iii) any other rights or interests of any kind or any nature whatsoever in or to any loan. We pay separate arm’s-length asset management fees (as assessed and confirmed by a third party valuation firm) for the Asset Manager’s services related to non-performing loans and reperforming loans. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the fees paid by us to the Asset Manager totaled $0.3 million.
Arc Home
On December 9, 2015, we, alongside private funds under the management of Angelo, Gordon, through AG Arc LLC, one of our indirect subsidiaries (“AG Arc”), entered into the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Arc Home LLC (“Arc Home”), a Delaware limited liability company. Arc Home, through its subsidiary, originates conforming, Government, Jumbo and other non-conforming residential mortgage loans and retains the associated mortgage servicing rights, as well as purchases additional mortgage servicing rights from third-party sellers and is led by an external management team (the “Management Team”). The Board of Managers of Arc Home consists of three members appointed by us and affiliates of our Manager and two members appointed by the Management Team. Our investment in Arc Home had a fair value of $12.9 million on December 31, 2016.
On March 8, 2016, an affiliate of the Manager (“the Affiliate”) became a member of AG Arc. The Affiliate acquired an ownership interest in AG Arc which resulted in our ownership interest being reduced on a pro-rata basis. As a result of the Affiliate becoming a member of AG Arc, our overall commitment to Arc Home was reduced to $13.4 million. We have funded all of this commitment as of December 31, 2016.
Arc Home may sell loans that it originates to third parties or to affiliates of our Manager and may also enter into agreements with third parties or affiliates of our Manager to sell rights to receive the excess servicing spread related to its MSRs. In September and October of 2016, Arc Home entered into agreements with an affiliate of our Manager to sell MSRs at fair value for approximately $10.7 million. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the fees received by Arc Home from affiliates of our Manager totaled less than $120,000.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
As of December 31, 2016, we have granted an aggregate of 43,660 and 40,250 shares of restricted common stock to our independent directors and Manager, respectively, and 60,000 shares of restricted stock units to our Manager under our equity incentive plans. As of December 31, 2016, all the shares of restricted common stock granted to our Manager and independent directors have vested and approximately 40,000 restricted stock units granted to our Manager have vested.
Other transactions with affiliates
In May 2015, we completed an arm’s-length securitization with other investors managed by an affiliate of the Manager (the “Related Parties”) by combining the assets of a prior private securitization, in which we held a 10.0% ownership interest, with the assets of another private securitization held entirely by the Related Parties. Our investment in this securitization had a fair value of $3.1 million as of the date of the securitization. We completed another similar arm’s-length securitization in July 2015 with the Related Parties by combining the assets of a private securitization, in which we held a 7.5% ownership interest, with the assets of another private securitization held entirely by the Related Parties. Our investment in this securitization had a fair value of $5.1 million as of the date of the securitization. Each securitization was backed by collateral consisting of seasoned NPLs and RPLs. We obtained third party pricing for each transaction.
In July 2015, we completed an arm’s-length investment purchase at fair value. Certain entities managed by an affiliate of our Manager (“Related Entities”) had previously formed a joint venture (“Joint Venture”) with an unaffiliated third party. The Joint Venture owns certain multi-family properties for which the mortgages partly collateralize a securitization wherein we purchased certain bond tranches. To ensure an arm’s-length transaction, the
 
30

Table of Contents
Manager delegated its decision making rights with respect to the securitization to a third party servicer. In addition, the members of the Joint Venture agreed to cease sharing material non-public information with our investment team regarding the collateral. Our investment in these bond tranches had a combined fair value of $7.1 million as of the date of purchase.
In June 2016, in accordance with our Affiliated Transactions Policy, we executed two trades whereby we acquired real estate securities from two separate affiliates of the Manager (the “Selling Affiliates”). As of the date of the trades, the securities acquired from the Selling Affiliates had a total fair value of $6.9 million. In each case, the Selling Affiliates sold the real estate securities through a BWIC (Bids Wanted in Competition). Prior to the submission of the BWIC by the Selling Affiliates, we submitted our bid for the real estate securities to the Selling Affiliates. The pre-submission of our bid allowed us to confirm third-party market pricing and best execution.
Stockholder Proposals
Any stockholder intending to present a proposal at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and have the proposal included in the proxy statement for such meeting must, in addition to complying with the applicable laws and regulations governing submissions of such proposals, submit the proposal in writing to us no later than November 22, 2017. To be included in the Proxy Statement, the proposal must comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC and our bylaws, and must be a proper subject for stockholder action under Maryland law.
Pursuant to our current bylaws, any stockholder intending to nominate a director or present a proposal at an annual meeting of our stockholders without seeking to have such a nomination or proposal included in the proxy statement for such annual meeting, must notify us in writing not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, any stockholder who intends to submit such a nomination or proposal at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders must notify us in writing of such proposal by November 22, 2017, but in no event earlier than October 23, 2017.
Any such nomination or proposal should be sent to AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., 245 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10167, Attn: Secretary, and, to the extent applicable, must include the information required by our bylaws.
Access to SEC Reports
A copy of the Company’s Annual Report, including financial statements, is being furnished concurrently herewith to all stockholders as of the Record Date. Please read it carefully.
Stockholders may obtain a copy of the Annual Report or proxy statement, without charge, by visiting the Company’s Web Site at  http://www.agmit.com  or by writing AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., 245 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10167, Attn: Secretary. These materials are also available at  http://www.proxyvote.com . Upon request to our Secretary, the exhibits set forth on the exhibit index of the Company’s Annual Report may be made available at a reasonable charge (which will be limited to our reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibits).
“Householding” of Proxy Statement and Annual Report
The SEC rules allow for the delivery of a single copy of the Notice or set of proxy materials to any household at which two or more stockholders reside, if it is believed the stockholders are members of the same family. This delivery method, known as “householding,” will save us printing and mailing costs. Duplicate account mailings will be eliminated by allowing stockholders to consent to such elimination, or through implied consent, if a stockholder does not request continuation of duplicate mailings. Brokers, dealers, banks or other nominees or fiduciaries that hold shares of our common stock in “street” name for beneficial owners of our common stock and that distribute proxy materials and the Notice they receive to beneficial owners may be householding. Depending upon the practices of your broker, bank or other nominee or fiduciary, you may need to contact them directly to discontinue duplicate mailings to your household. If you wish to revoke your consent to householding, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee or fiduciary.
 
31

Table of Contents
If you hold shares of our common stock in your own name as a holder of record, householding will not apply to your shares. Also, if you own shares of our common stock in more than one account, such as individually and also jointly with your spouse, you may receive more than one set of our proxy statements and annual reports to stockholders. To assist us in saving money and to provide you with better stockholder services, we encourage registered holders of our stock to have all of your accounts registered in the same name and address. You may do this by contacting the Company’s transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, by telephone at (800) 937-5449 or in writing at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219.
If you wish to request extra copies free of charge of any annual report to stockholders or proxy statement, please send your request to AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., 245 Park Avenue, New York, New York, 10167, Attn: Secretary, or contact our Secretary via telephone at (212) 692-2000. You can also refer to the Company’s Web Site at  www.agmit.com . Information at, or connected to, the Company’s Web Site is not and should not be considered part of this proxy statement.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
Raul E. Moreno
General Counsel and Secretary
New York, New York
March 22, 2017
 
32

Table of Contents
Annex I
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
TO
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT
OF
AG MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), desiring to amend its charter as currently amended and restated and in effect (the “Charter”), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland as follows:
FIRST: The Corporation’s Charter is hereby amended by deleting Section 5.9 in its entirety.
SECOND: The amendment to the Charter of the Corporation as set forth above has been duly advised, adopted and approved by the Board of Directors and approved by the stockholders of the Corporation as required by law.
THIRD: There has been no increase in the authorized stock of the Corporation effected by the amendment to the Charter of the Corporation as set forth above.
FOURTH: The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation acknowledges these Articles of Amendment to be the corporate act of the Corporation and, as to all matters or facts required to be verified under oath, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer acknowledges that, to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, these matters and facts are true in all material respects and that this statement is made under penalties for perjury.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
 
33

Table of Contents
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its Chief Executive Officer and attested to by its Secretary on this            day of May, 2017.
 
ATTEST: | | | | AG MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
By: | | | | | | By: | |
Name: | | Raul E. Moreno | | | | Name: | | David Roberts
Title: | | Secretary | | | | Title: | | Chief Executive Officer
 
34

Table of Contents

AG MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
245 PARK AVE., 26TH FL.
NEW YORK, NY 10167

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
 
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
 
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
 
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
 
| | | | For | | Withhold | | For All | | | | | | | | | | |
The board of directors recommends you vote FOR all of the Nominees listed in Proposal 1. | | All | | All | | Except | | To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. | | | | | | |
1. | | Election of Directors Nominees | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | | | | | | |
01 | | Arthur Ainsberg           02   Andrew L. Berger           03   Joseph LaManna           04   Jonathan Lieberman           05   Peter Linneman | | | | |
06 | | David N. Roberts         07   Frank Stadelmaier | | | | |
The board of directors recommends you vote FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4. | | For | | Against | | Abstain | | | | |
2. | | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017; | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | |
3. | | Approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation; and | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | |
4. | | Approval of the Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement. | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | |
For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) | | ☐ | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | | Date | | Signature (Joint Owners) | | Date | | | | | | |

Table of Contents
 
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice, Proxy Statement, and Annual Report are available at  www.proxyvote.com .
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

AG MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 3, 2017 at 10:00 AM
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
 
The undersigned hereby appoints David N. Roberts and Raul E. Moreno, and each of them, with full power of substitution and power to act alone, as proxies to vote all the shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present and acting at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., to be held at the offices of Angelo, Gordon & Co., 245 Park Avenue, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10167, on Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 
Address change/comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
 
Continued and to be signed on reverse side